Template talk:adverb

Formatting

The previous template for adverb repeated, verbatim, the section heading and the article name. I can think of no situation in which these would be different. Consequently, I removed the redundant information. I left the category link in because removing it would require someone to insert it into all existing adverb sections.

comparative/superlative links

Should they be linked? We can link in the template. Most adverbs don't have comparative forms but take more. I assume that we aren't to create the entries for, e.g., most certainly, right? -- 124.171.169.189 (talk) 23:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, seems this template does support it. (more=true) -- 124.171.169.189 (talk) 03:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)