Rimshot

Hi and welcome to my talk page. Just click here to start a new topic. I prefer to have discussions in one place. If you start a topic here, I will answer here. If I ask something on your page, I will expect an answer there. Do not worry if it takes me a few days to respond. I am more active on other wikis and will not check this page all the time.

Welcome to the Simple English Wiktionary!

We hope you are happy editing here. Some helpful pages to start you off are Wiktionary:Community Portal and Help:Contents.

For an explanation of the editing format here, see Wiktionary:How to edit.

If you want to meet and talk with other members, you can visit Wiktionary:Simple talk. Just remember that you should sign your messages on Talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.--Brett 11:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

What to bold

I understand what you're saying, but I think that although certain prepositions that are licensed by a particular adjective (e.g., involved in, responsible for, aware of, etc.) are very common, they really are just complements, not part of the head. I would stick with just emboldening :-) the head word.--Brett 14:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Hm, okay, I just thought it might be misleading, but I can live with how it's written now. --rimshot^talk 09:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Adjective template

Thanks for the changes. Is there any way to automatically change all the 200-300 adjectives that have the old syntax?--Brett 10:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I guess AWB or anything similar could be used to do that, but there really aren't so many adjectives that need the change. Most adjectives are either regular or non-comparable. I'll just change the rest. --rimshot^talk 11:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. I've found some strange inflections on the way, so it's good not to have done it automatically. --rimshot^talk 12:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!--Brett 19:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Target

Hi, Rimshot! Thank you for your contributions. As you can see, I've added a target to the main page. I hope everyone will be inspired to work together to achieve it.--Brett 17:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Good luck with that goal. Maybe I'll add a few entries. --rimshot^talk 11:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Transwiki

Hi. I transwikied Hadith. Did I do it correctly? (I didn't transwiki to the Transwiki namespace, but directly to Hadith. Is it ok?) Huji 16:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I am no expert on transwiki'ing, but it seems fine to me. There is no need to use the Transwiki namespace if you immediately format the page as a wiktionary entry. One thing, though: the dictionaries I checked have hadith as regular noun, not as proper noun. This isn't obvious, as many pages, in particular this one, freely switch between hadith and Hadith. I wanted to move the page to hadith. Brett was faster than me, however. --rimshot^talk 17:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, to be frank, I didn't make hadith's first word capitalize to mean any thing! I just wasn't aware that in wiktionary, articles are case-sensitive in regard to their first word. Huji 17:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Foul Fowl

I knew that!  :-) --Coppertwig 12:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Sure :p --rimshot^talk 08:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)