The other is brighter and honestly, more appealing to me, but this one makes the dictionary idea much more clear. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 16:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Fulfills function of logo to identify concept. Looks much better. Barliner (talk) 17:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Seems less vague foreign and confusing. Also more attractive. Kiko4564 (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm in. Mr. Berty (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Much clearer iconographically speaking, although the puzzle piece motif could be much bigger and prominent. The current one is a jumble and has no clearly defined shape. C xong (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Looks better than the previous one. Pmlineditor∞ 10:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Looks much better, though not the best --Extra999 (Contact me + changes) 04:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Combining the traditional image of a dictionary with the puzzle look of Wikimedia's most recognizable logo makes absolute sense. - TheDaveRoss (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
It is a clear logo that it is a dictionary for Simple English readers. Hydriz (talk) 06:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)