MathXplore

Archives

• /2022
• /2023
• /Archive 1 (latest archive)

AWB

Hi, can you use AWB here? Kk.urban (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

According to Wiktionary:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#For_allowed_users, yes I can. In addition, user:Minorax and user:DannyS712 are experienced AWB users. How can we help you? MathXplore (talk) 02:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I believe "see also" should be changed to "related words" on all dictionary entries. Kk.urban (talk) 02:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Per WT:ELE/RW, I agree with the need for such actions. @Minorax:, would you like to handle this task via AWB? MathXplore (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll do this over the weekend. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation. MathXplore (talk) 01:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Should be done now, made some mistakes along the way so do edit accordingly when anyone seems them --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Now I'm worried I may have been wrong to change "see also" to "related words" on fuchsia. @Brett, Hydriz, Coppertwig: should this be "see also" or "related words"? Kk.urban (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Related words are etymologically, not semantically related. See also should rarely be used. Brett (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

@Brett In this case, the words were "fuchsia" and "magenta". Should that be "see also"? Kk.urban (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

🤷🏼 Brett (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I think "related words" are specific, while "see also" looks simpler but vague. In the same manner, simplewiki uses "Related pages" (w:WP:MOS). MathXplore (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

I don't think that user:Hydriz is currently active. MathXplore (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)